Library
  • XR Guild Library 2.0
  • AI Ethics
    • Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work: Mapping the Ethical Issues
    • Why the Godfather of AI Now Fears His Creation
    • Is 'Ethical AI' a Fantasy? - TRIP Annual Symposium 2024
    • Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review
    • Ethics in AI Seminar: Responsible Research and Publication in AI
    • Trustworthy AI and Ethics with IBM Consulting's Phaedra Boinodiris
    • AI is an energy hog. This is what it means for climate change.
    • Non-Consensual Synthetic Intimate Imagery: Prevalence, Attitudes, and Knowledge in 10 Countries
    • Unraveling the Ethical Conundrum of Artificial Intelligence: A Synthesis of Literature and Case Stud
    • Ethics of AI: Challenges and Governance
    • AI hiring tools may be filtering out the best job applicants
    • AI Ethics: A Bibliometric Analysis, Critical Issues, and Key Gaps
    • Tackling problems, harvesting benefits -- A systematic review of the regulatory debate around AI
    • Global Dialogues on AI
    • UN Global Digital Compact
  • Current Peer-Reviewed Immersive Technologies
    • Towards Understanding Diminished Reality
    • BlendMR: A Computational Method To Create Ambient Mixed Reality Interfaces
    • RealityReplay: Detecting and Replaying Temporal Changes In Situ using Mixed Reality
    • A Survey on Remote Assistance and Training in Mixed Reality Environments
    • SemanticAdapt: Optimization-based Adaptation of Mixed Reality Layouts Leveraging Virtual-Physical Se
    • Auptimize: Optimal Placement of Spatial Audio Cues for Extended Reality
    • TurnAware: Motion-aware Augmented Reality Information Delivery While Walking
    • SecureMR - Security and Privacy for Camera Access in XR Applications
    • The Poetics of Augmented Space
    • Integrating Immersive Technologies with STEM Education
    • Educational Administration: Theory and Practice
    • Immersive technologies as an innovative tool to increase academic success and motivation
    • Metaverse as a Cutting-edge Platform for Attaining Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    • Defining immersion and immersive technologies
    • A bibliometric analysis of immersive technology in museum exhibitions: exploring user experience
    • The Combination of Artificial Intelligence and Extended Reality: A Systematic Review
    • Technology Integration Methods for Bi-directional Brain-computer Interfaces and XR-based Interventio
    • Towards an Eye-Brain-Computer Interface: Combining Gaze with the Stimulus-Preceding Negativity
    • Immersive interfaces for clinical applications: current status and future perspective
    • Hypersphere - XR Design for Metaverse by Synthesizing Neuro Reality and Virtual Reality
    • CAVE: An Emerging Immersive Technology - A Review
    • Experiences with a Virtual Reality System for Immersive Decision Making and Learning
    • Virtual Reality: How Much Immersion Is Enough?
  • Ethical Responsibility
    • Cybersecurity and Privacy Challenges in Extended Reality: Threats, Solutions, and Risk Mitigation...
    • The Poetics of Augmented Space
    • Ethical Considerations When Designing and Implementing Immersive Realities in Nursing Education
    • Ethical considerations in designing virtual and augmented reality products - virtual and augmented r
    • XRAI-Ethics: Towards a Robust Ethical Analysis Framework for Extended Artificial Intelligence
    • An XR Ethics Framework
    • Extended Reality (XR) and the Erosion of Anonymity and Privacy
    • Who Owns Our Second Lives: Virtual Clones and the Right to Your Identity
    • The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Extended Reality (XR) Report - Metaverse and Its Governance
    • The Ethics of Realism in Virtual and Augmented Reality
    • Smart Workplaces for Older Adults: Coping 'Ethically' with Technology Pervasiveness - Ageing@Work an
    • 2089-2021 - IEEE Standard for an Age Appropriate Digital Services Framework Based on the 5Rights Pri
    • State of the Art in Ethics for AR
    • Mapping of the ethical Issues in XR-overview of Ethical Frameworks: A Scoping Review
    • Quality Considerations for Ethical Design of Virtual and Augmented Reality.
    • Beyond Speculation About the Ethics of Virtual Reality: The Need for Empirical Results
    • Getting rescued by RoboCop? Legal and ethical challenges of the use of extended reality in Frontex’s
    • Who will govern the metaverse? Examining governance initiatives for extended reality (XR) technologi
    • A Survey of Extended Reality (XR) Standards
  • XR Industry news/events/Sources
    • VRARA Events
    • XRSI News
    • IEEE News
    • XRA News
    • XR TODAY Events
    • VR Marketing News
    • MSF Newsroom
    • AWE Blog
    • OpenXR (Khronos Group)
    • CES
    • Augmented Reality for Enterprise Alliance
    • XR Fair Tokyo
    • Mobile World Congress
    • Stereopsia
    • XR Expo
    • Laval Virtual
    • XR & Metaverse Standards Register
    • XRWomen Research Library
  • Neurotechnology, Brain Tech, and Ethical Challenges
    • Brain augmentation and neuroscience technologies
    • U.S. Public Perceptions of the Sensitivity of Brain Data
    • Protecting Neural Data Privacy—First, Do No Harm
    • Neurotechnology: Current Developments and Ethical Issues
    • Karen Rommelfanger - Neuroethics and the Future of Neurotechnology
    • My Brain Made Me Buy It: The Neuroethics of Advertising - Exploring Ethics
    • IEEE Brain Episode 17: Q&A with Dr. Cristin Welle, Associate Professor, University of Colorado
    • Mindscape 229: Nita Farahany on Ethics, Law, and Neurotechnology
    • Ethics of Neurotechnology
    • Understanding the Ethical Issues of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs): A Blessing or the Beginning of
    • Ethics and Governance of Neurotechnology in Africa: Lessons From AI
    • TED Radio Hour: Your brain is the next tech frontier
    • Use of Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces in Pediatric Neurosurgery: Technical and Ethical Considera
    • FUTURES: Designing Brain-Computer Interfaces" with Conor Russomanno
    • Neurotechnology and the Battle for Your Brain
    • Ethical Frontiers: Navigating the Intersection of Neurotechnology and Cybersecurity
    • Neuroethics and AI Ethics: A Proposal for Collaboration
    • An Integrated Embodiment Concept Combines Neuroethics and AI Ethics
    • Neuroethics Today
  • Mind Control and Privacy at Work
    • Brain Recording, Mind-Reading, and Neurotechnology: Ethical Issues from Consumer Devices
    • The Convergence of Virtual Reality and Social Networks: Threats to Privacy and Autonomy
    • Ethics Emerging: the Story of Privacy and Security Perceptions in Virtual Reality
    • Neuroinsights in Immersive Worlds: Safeguarding Cognitive Freedom in Virtual Realms
    • Digital body, identity and privacy in social virtual reality: A systematic review
    • The concept “freedom” in a virtual reality of the information society
    • Freedom of Thinking in the Terms
    • Mind control: The metaverse may be the ultimate tool of persuasion
    • Metaverse in Mental Health: The Beginning of a Long History
    • “Playing God”: How the metaverse will challenge our very notion of free will
    • The Metaverse: the Ultimate Tool of Persuasion
    • Searching for the Metaverse: Neuroscience of Physical and Digital Communities
    • The neurosociological paradigm of the metaverse
    • Metaverse and Privacy
    • The enterprise metaverse, cognitive science, and interpersonal communication
    • The Metaverse: from Marketing to Mind Control
  • Physiological and Psychological effects of XR
    • Empathy and Perspective Taking
    • Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality...
    • A VIRTUAL SAFE SPACE? AN APPROACH OF INTERSECTIONALITY AND SOCIAL IDENTITY TO BEHAVIOR IN VIRTUAL...
    • Who Do You Think You Are? What Does Your Avatar Say About You?
    • LET'S CONNECT IN METAVERSE. BRAND'S NEW DESTINATION TO INCREASE CONSUMERS' AFFECTIVE BRAND...
    • The psychological impact of the Metaverse
    • The effect of virtual reality forest and urban environments on physiological and psychological...
    • The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Exercise on Individual’s Physiological, Psychological and...
    • A perspective on potential psychological risks and solutions of using virtual reality in...
    • The impact of immersive virtual reality meditation for depression and anxiety among inpatients...
    • Digital body, identity and privacy in social virtual reality: A systematic review
    • Virtual Reality and Emotion: A 5-Year Systematic Review of Empirical Research
    • Virtual Reality Games and the Role of Body Involvement in Enhancing Positive Emotions and...
    • Empowering Social Growth Through Virtual Reality–Based Intervention for Children With Attention...
    • Influence of Avatar Identification on the Attraction of Virtual Reality Games: Survey Study
    • How Avatar Identification Affects Enjoyment in the Metaverse: The Roles of Avatar Customization...
    • Influence of Avatar Identification on the Attraction of Virtual Reality Games: Survey Study
    • Beyond the pixelated mirror: Understanding avatar identity and its impact on in-game advertising...
    • Exploring the user-avatar relationship in videogames: A systematic review of the Proteus effect
    • VR: A Path to Mental Wellness
  • Privacy & Policy
    • Voices Of VR #1091: IEEE XR Ethics: The Erosion of Privacy & Anonymity
    • Privacy and Ethical Considerations for Extended Reality Settings - On Tech Ethics
    • Rethinking Privacy in the AI Era
    • AI Data, Governance and Privacy: SYNERGIES AND AREAS OF INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION
    • Safety and Privacy in Immersive Extended Reality: An Analysis and Policy Recommendations
    • Cybersecurity and Privacy Challenges in Extended Reality: Threats, Solutions, and Risk Mitigation...
    • Extended Reality (XR) Ethics
    • Voices Of VR #997: Debating XR Privacy Tech Policy with Ellysse Dick
    • XR In the Classroom: Student Privacy and Safety
    • Augmenting Security and Privacy in the Virtual. Realm: An Analysis of Extended Reality Devices
    • Privacy Preservation in Artificial Intelligence and Extended Reality (AI-XR) Metaverses: A Survey
    • On Tech Ethics Podcast – Privacy and Ethical Considerations for Extended Reality Settings
    • OVRseen: Auditing Network Traffic and Privacy Policies in Oculus VR
    • Reality Check: Why the U.S. Government Should Nurture XR Development
    • The Tech Law Hangout
  • Security & Safety
    • Safety and Privacy in Immersive Extended Reality: An Analysis and Policy Recommendations
    • Implications of XR on Privacy, Security and Behaviour: Insights
    • XR Trends 2022 (11/12): XR Safety and Security
    • Futuristic Metaverse: Security and Counter Measures
    • Navigating the XR Educational Landscape: Privacy, Safety, and Ethical Guidelines
    • VR headsets may lead users to the ER
    • Concerns with Privacy in Virtual Reality
    • What are the Security and Privacy Risks of VR and AR
    • VR Risks For Kids And Teens
    • We Share Pro Tips To Implement VR Industrial Training Successfully
    • Virtual Reality Headsets
    • Voices Of VR #786: XR Safety Initiative: Security, Privacy, & Ethics in XR
    • XR and AI for Security and Privacy with Luis Bravo Martins
    • AMXRA Guidelines on Extended Reality and Children
  • Glossary
  • Archive
    • Videos
      • XR Guild
      • Rolando Masís-Obando (XRMasiso)
      • Avi Bar-Zeev
      • Louis Rosenberg
      • Sarah A. Barker
        • VR| A Path to Mental Wellness: Meet VR Experience Designer Owen Harris
        • VR: A Path to Mental Wellness: Meet VR Experience Designer Owen Harris
        • VR: A Path to Mental Wellness: Meet Brennan Spiegel
    • Extended Principles
    • Newsletters
      • Metaversethics.org
    • Podcasts
      • Voices of VR Podcast
      • VR: A Path to Mental Wellness
      • The Virtual World Society Podcast
      • Experiment: Google NotebookLM version of existing works
    • Written Works
      • ACM Whitepapers on Ethics
      • IEEE Whitepapers on Ethics
      • Louis Rosenberg
      • Brittan Heller
      • Avi Bar-Zeev
      • Nita Farahany
      • W3C Papers and Principles
      • Additional Papers
    • XR Guild Library Database
      • Issues around Safety
      • Physiological and Psychological effects of XR
      • Industry news/implications
      • Data Privacy & Policy
      • Current Peer-Reviewed Immersive Technologies, Human Psychology and Ethics
    • Science and Ethics Council Topics
      • Cybersickness and Nauseation
      • Accessibility
      • Brain Computer Interfaces
      • The Magic (and Limits) of Human Visual Perception
      • Conversational Agents
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Definitions
  • Examples
  • Concerns
  • Known Mitigations
  • Papers:
  1. Archive
  2. Science and Ethics Council Topics

Cybersickness and Nauseation

Understanding why it occurs and how to mitigate (Written by Avi Bar-Zeev)

Summary

Nauseation remains a challenge for all XR devices. A significant percentage of participants (up to 75%, by survey) have felt nauseated under some circumstances in XR experiences, with wide variance of severity and duration. There also appears to be a gender bias against women by a significant amount which we feel needs to be better understood.

Definitions

Nauseation is a feeling of disorientation, dizziness, discomfort, leading to an urge to empty one’s upper digestive tract. The feeling gets worse with prolonged negative stimuli, and often requires extensive rest (from a few hours to days) to recover.

Cybersickness is a form of nauseation caused by the use of XR devices.

Examples

All XR headsets can cause nauseation for most people under some circumstances. We expect the most nauseation to occur in VR headsets with very wide fields of view and with content that simulates fast vehicular motion without the corresponding physical forces. The more dramatic the motion (including being closer to large fast-moving objects), the worse the effect. Putting people in unusual orientations, like looking down on the planet from orbit can also contribute to the negative stimuli.

As we experience more AR-style (e.g., optical or video pass-through) headsets, the amount of content from a person’s natural environment increases, and therefore artificial motion makes less sense. In the case of full video or optical pass-through, the only motion is that of the participant’s own body, which matches closely between visual and vestibular cues. However, there are still cases where nauseation can be triggered in full-AR headsets, such as with large amounts of motion blur or high update latencies from video-pass-through (e.g., above 12 ms is known to be problematic), where the virtual and physical content can be out of sync. This is also often called 'registration error.'

Concerns

The best understood aspect of nauseation observes a mismatch between vestibular sensation (from the human inner ear, generally used for balance and orientation) and the visual system, which includes multiple strategies to make sense of our 3D environment. This mismatch can happen when XR visuals indicate motion but the inner ear senses no change. It can also happen when a person moves but the visuals don't change in the same way, as can occur with 3DOF content (e.g., spherical panoramas).

One theory as to why this mismatch results in an impulse to vomit vs. other sensations is that the human body apparently has no direct sensory organs to detect most kinds of food poisoning. It evolved to recognise a mismatch in senses as a symptom of poisoning. Excessive alcohol consumption has a similar result, both by blurring our senses while intoxicated. Changes to the density of inner ear fluids may occur during hangovers, requiring re-hydration.

Researchers are deeply concerned that there seems to be a gender bias in terms of more women feeling nausea from HMD use. One theory, not currently supported by empirical data, is that because women have narrower inter-pupillary distances and not all headsets support them, they may see the virtual content less clearly (on average) than men who have larger IPDs. There may be subtle differences in how men and women tend to process 3D visual information involved as well.

Known Mitigations

In the most immersive VR situations, narrowing the field of view during simulated motion can help lower symptoms of nauseation. Avoiding all artificial motion as a top-level design constraint can also help significantly. For example, jumping between fixed portals can significantly reduce the negative effects of traveling vs. simulated walking or flying. It’s generally best to match the participant's natural motions 1:1 in the virtual world, while avoiding physical furniture and walls.

Across AR & VR type experiences, keeping the frame-rate as high as possible, lowering motion-to-photon latency, reducing screen-door and optical distortion artifacts, and avoiding motion-blur effects all can help. In fact, no one has yet reported a maximum framerate above which no improvement in nauseation can be detected. Better optics inside HMDs do indeed seem to help reduce nauseation. We also know that undue heat and weight on the face are contributory factors to this kind of discomfort.

At the more AR end of the spectrum, avoiding all artificial motion, or the motion of many large proximal virtual objects, or mismatches in registration between virtual and natural content can help. Reducing the amount of virtual content entirely can help reduce nausea. Seeing oneself move in the physical environment 1:1 with AR graphics ordinarily delivers the correct sensation to the inner ear to avoid most nausea in this modality. However, it’s possible that differences in the way different people perceive 3D cues may be worse in optical-see-through AR systems, e.g., most OST devices can not perfectly render shadows or light-to-dark lighting variations without resulting in unwanted transparency.

As far as direct hardware mitigations, some researchers have experimented with adding forces on the inner ear to simulate those missing vestibular sensations that would arise from motion. Magnets or electrical signals may be able to induce artificial sensations of motion. Injecting ferrous fluids into the inner ear doesn’t seem like a practical solution for most people. Anti-nausea medicines may help, but may not be practical to take on a long-term basis.

Papers:

Last updated 8 months ago

AUTHORS

Widespread adoption of virtual reality (VR) will likely be limited by the common occurrence of cybersickness. Cybersickness susceptibility varies across individuals, and previous research reported that interpupillary distance (IPD) may be a factor. However, that work emphasized cybersickness recovery rather than cybersickness immediately after exposure. The current study (N=178) examined if the mismatch between the user's IPD and the VR headset's IPD setting contributes to immediate cybersickness. Multiple linear regression indicated that gender and prior sickness due to screens were significant predictors of immediate cybersickness. However, no relationship between IPD mismatch and immediate cybersickness was observed.

The aim of this study was to assess what drives gender-based differences in the experience of cybersickness within virtual environments. In general, those who have studied cybersickness (i.e., motion sickness associated with virtual reality [VR] exposure), oftentimes report that females are more susceptible than males. As there are many individual factors that could contribute to gender differences, understanding the biggest drivers could help point to solutions. Two experiments were conducted in which males and females were exposed for 20 min to a virtual rollercoaster. In the first experiment, individual factors that may contribute to cybersickness were assessed via self-report, body measurements, and surveys. Cybersickness was measured via the simulator sickness questionnaire and physiological sensor data. Interpupillary distance (IPD) non-fit was found to be the primary driver of gender differences in cybersickness, with motion sickness susceptibility identified as a secondary driver. Females whose IPD could not be properly fit to the VR headset and had a high motion sickness history suffered the most cybersickness and did not fully recover within 1 h post exposure. A follow-on experiment demonstrated that when females could properly fit their IPD to the VR headset, they experienced cybersickness in a manner similar to males, with high cybersickness immediately upon cessation of VR exposure but recovery within 1 h post exposure. Taken together, the results suggest that gender differences in cybersickness may be largely contingent on whether or not the VR display can be fit to the IPD of the user; with a substantially greater proportion of females unable to achieve a good fit. VR displays may need to be redesigned to have a wider IPD adjustable range in order to reduce cybersickness rates, especially among females.

, , Michael Dorneich, and

1* 1 2

Does interpupillary distance (IPD) relate to immediate cybersickness?
Jonathan Kelly
Taylor Doty
Stephen B. Gilbert
Virtual Reality Is Sexist: But It Does Not Have to Be
Kay Stanney
Cali Fidopiastis
Linda Foster